From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: discuss@x86-64.org
Cc: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] change_page_attr() and global_flush_tlb()
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:43:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704051443.12505.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4614DE61.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
On Thursday 05 April 2007 11:32:49 Jan Beulich wrote:
> Looking at both the i386 and x86-64 implementations I fail to understand why
> there is an explicit requirement on calling global_flush_tlb() after
> change_page_attr(), yet actual TLB flushing will not normally happen (on i386
> it will happen if the CPU doesn't support clflush, but if it does, or on x86-64,
> the flushing depends on the list of deferred pages being non-empty, which
> can only happen when a large page gets re-combined). Is it assumed that
> the callers additionally call tlb_flush_all() (I think none of them do)?
Not sure I understand the question? global_flush_tlb is perhaps a little
misnamed, but it only flushes the pages changed in change_page_attr.
This works because it uses INVLPG which should ignore the G bits,
so not additional global flush is needed.
Linus wanted it done this two step way because he was worried about too
many IPIs. I guess it doesn't make too much difference though because near all
callers only change single pages. The flush could be probably folded
back into c_p_a().
BTW we know the sequence for doing this is not quite as recommended
by Intel (TODO item) but afaik the TLB flushing works.
> Further, change_page_attr()'s reference counting in a split large page's
> page table appears to imply that attributes are only changed from or back to
> the reference attributes, but not from one kind of non-default ones to the
> same or another set of non-default ones (otherwise the reference count
> will never again drop to zero), > and also not from default to default (i.e. the
> caller trying to revert attributes to normal not knowing what state they are
> currently in) - this would BUG() if the large page was already reverted, or
> screw the reference count otherwise. Is all of this intentional? I think it
> will need to be changed as a prerequisite to supporting on-the-fly attribute
> changes in the SMP alternatives code, which was requested as a follow-up
> to the tightening of the CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA effects.
The reference count is just to count pages that have a non default attribute
in the PMD range so that we know when to revert to a large page.
Originally attribute was only the caching attribute, but later changed
to include NX and RW for slab (but that area was always a bit hackish
and might have some bugs)
For non default to another non default changes the count should not change.
If it doesn't work this way that would be a bug.
> Finally, at least for the kernel image range it would seem to me that it might
> be beneficial to recombine mappings into large ones even when the
> attributes are not at their default anymore, but consistent across an entire
> 2Mb/4Mb range (i.e. after write-protecting .text). At the same time I wonder,
> though, whether it wouldn't be safer to remove execute permission from
> anything but .text along with write-protecting read-only regions under
> CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.
Yes I guess that would be a useful optimization. Just getting
the reference counting right with that might be tricky.
At least the i386 code will probably change significantly soon as I clean
up the GB page patches, which require some restructuring in c_p_a().
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-05 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 9:32 change_page_attr() and global_flush_tlb() Jan Beulich
2007-04-05 12:43 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-05 13:52 ` [discuss] " Jan Beulich
2007-04-05 14:09 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704051443.12505.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=discuss@x86-64.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox