From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767450AbXDEXyx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:54:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767449AbXDEXyx (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:54:53 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36883 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767450AbXDEXyw (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 19:54:52 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bugfix for VMI paravirt ops Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 01:54:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds References: <46158674.5090709@vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <46158674.5090709@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704060154.41574.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 06 April 2007 01:29:56 Zachary Amsden wrote: > I noticed this never got applied. There was some feedback which I did > not include in this patch because I think it is inappropriate to touch > code outside vmi.c at this point for 2.6.21. I think it is. That is why i didn't apply it. -Andi