Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make page->private usable in compound pages V1

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > > We add PageTail as an alias of PageReclaim. Compound pages cannot
> > > currently be reclaimed. Because of the alias one needs to check
> > > PageCompound first.
> > 
> > So slub is using compound pages so that it can locate the head page in
> > higher-order pages, whereas slab uses per-object (or per-order-0-page?)
> > metadata for that?
> 
> Both SLAB and SLUB use compound pages.

Not really.  slab sets the page->lru.prev of each constituent page to point
at the controlling slab.

I assume the PageCompound() handling in (for example) page_get_cache() is
for the NOMMU special case.

> > 
> > I see four instances of
> > 
> > +	page = virt_to_page(p);
> > +
> > +	if (unlikely(PageCompound(page)))
> > +		page = page->first_page;
> > 
> > A new virt_to_head_page() is needed.
> 
> Ok.
>  
>  > Sigh.  We're seeing rather a lot of churn to accommodate slub.  Do we
> > actually have any justification for all this?  If we end up deciding to
> > merge slub and to deprecate then remove slab, what would our reasons have
> > been?
> 
> This is not SLUB specific. SLAB does the same. SLAB does special casing 
> for page size slabs and does not allow slab debugging because it would 
> use page->private if debugging would be enabled. Which would get into 
> trouble on i386.
> 
> If you want less SLUB churn on other fronts then I can add the special 
> casing for PAGE_SIZE slabs back into SLUB. Then we keep all the 
> inconsistencies in SLAB use in the code.
> 
> I'd rather clean up the stuff and then also remove the special casing from 
> SLAB.
> 

Will slub handle NOMMU anonymous pages appropriately?