From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:38:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070406223821.GL29169@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4616CA22.7040005@tmr.com>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
> >
> It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
> are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality.
> Yes, people can take 10-15 minutes to find and read previous discussion,
> but one or two sentences who generate less concern and noise on the list.
For everyone on linux-kernel, the text my patch removes in
feature-removal-schedule.txt should be sufficient.
Users already had a printk() stating that it was deprecated.
> Bill Davidsen
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-06 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-20 0:06 [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI Adrian Bunk
2007-02-24 14:20 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-04-06 22:30 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-04-06 22:38 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-06 10:19 Adrian Bunk
2007-04-06 10:29 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-06 10:38 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-04-06 10:46 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-01 20:20 Adrian Bunk
2007-07-02 23:22 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-02 23:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-03 0:36 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-03 1:06 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-03 1:13 ` Dave Jones
2007-07-08 21:39 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070406223821.GL29169@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox