public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Avoid checking for cpu gone when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU not defined
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 08:25:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070409025533.GB30109@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070406232500.3fd84c77.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:25:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 14:41:50 -0700 "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Subject: Avoid checking for cpu gone when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU not defined
> > 
> > Avoid checking for cpu gone in mm hot path when
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is not defined.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>
> > 
> > ---
> >  arch/i386/kernel/smp.c |    4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: work/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- work.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ work/arch/i386/kernel/smp.c
> > @@ -365,10 +365,12 @@ static void flush_tlb_others(cpumask_t c
> >  	BUG_ON(cpu_isset(smp_processor_id(), cpumask));
> >  	BUG_ON(!mm);
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> >  	/* If a CPU which we ran on has gone down, OK. */
> >  	cpus_and(cpumask, cpumask, cpu_online_map);
> > -	if (cpus_empty(cpumask))
> > +	if (unlikely(cpus_empty(cpumask)))
> >  		return;
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * i'm not happy about this global shared spinlock in the
> 
> Fair enough.
> 
> The code you're touching in with the original CPU-hotplug-for-i386 patches.
> 
> x86_64 doesn't do it.  It handles tlb flushing differently anyway.  But I
> suspect that x86_64 is just buggy, unless all callers of flush_tlb_others()
> have taken care to disable preemption prior to their calculation of the
> passed-in cpumask.
> 
> Shudder.  Gautham, this is code which we can cheerfully delete when we get
> the freezer stuff done.  Fortunately, Anil's patch will make it nice and
> easy to find again.

Ok, I will make a note of this one.

If the IO-test results are good, I hope to post the patchset sometime
this week.


Thanks and Regards
gautham.

-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"

      reply	other threads:[~2007-04-09  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-06 21:41 Avoid checking for cpu gone when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU not defined Keshavamurthy, Anil S
2007-04-07  6:25 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-09  2:55   ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070409025533.GB30109@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox