From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: menage@google.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, dev@sw.ru,
xemul@sw.ru, serue@us.ibm.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
mbligh@google.com, rohitseth@google.com, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Containers (V8): BeanCounters over generic process containers
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:44:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070409164434.GU2986@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070407001324.840593000@menage.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:32:27PM -0700, menage@google.com wrote:
> This patch implements the BeanCounter resource control abstraction
> over generic process containers. It contains the beancounter core
> code, plus the numfiles resource counter. It doesn't currently contain
> any of the memory tracking code or the code for switching beancounter
> context in interrupts.
> Currently all the beancounters resource counters are lumped into a
> single hierarchy; ideally it would be possible for each resource
> counter to be a separate container subsystem, allowing them to be
I'm very happy to see the BeanCounter work revived. The utility of
this work should extend far beyond feature work like containers and
into stability and reliability areas as well.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-09 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-06 23:32 [PATCH 0/7] Containers (V8): Generic Process Containers menage
2007-04-06 23:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] Containers (V8): Generic container system abstracted from cpusets code menage
2007-04-06 23:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] Containers (V8): Cpusets hooked into containers menage
2007-04-23 10:52 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-04-25 4:59 ` Paul Menage
2007-04-06 23:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] Containers (V8): Simple CPU accounting container subsystem menage
2007-04-10 13:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-06 23:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] Containers (V8): Resource Groups over generic containers menage
2007-04-06 23:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] Containers (V8): BeanCounters over generic process containers menage
2007-04-09 7:46 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-09 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2007-04-06 23:32 ` [PATCH 7/7] Containers (V8): Container interface to nsproxy subsystem menage
[not found] ` <20070407001324.271959000@menage.corp.google.com>
2007-04-07 1:58 ` [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/7] Containers (V8): Add generic multi-subsystem API to containers Paul Menage
2007-04-07 4:18 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-07 17:30 ` Paul Menage
2007-04-10 14:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-10 14:52 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-10 15:45 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2007-04-11 4:47 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-11 5:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-11 8:42 ` Paul Menage
2007-04-11 16:42 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-23 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/7] Containers (V8): Generic Process Containers Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-04-25 5:04 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070409164434.GU2986@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox