From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: per-thread rusage
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 16:53:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070409165315.4704021f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070404181050.GN2986@holomorphy.com>
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:10:50 -0700
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 10:29:31 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
> >> It is not now possible for a thread to retrieve its own rusage in
> >> isolation. Its rusage is nowhere exposed without being intermixed with
> >> that of its sibling threads. This patch adds support for an
> >> RUSAGE_THREAD who argument that returns rusage for only the desired
> >> thread.
>
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:48:29PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Please check mm, because we now return ru_inblock and ru_oublock as well.
> > r->ru_inblock = task_io_get_inblock(p);
> > r->ru_oublock = task_io_get_oublock(p);
>
> Respun vs. 2.6.21-rc5-mm4, still untested. Also...
>
> Signed-off-by: William Irwin <bill.irwin@oracle.com>
>
>
> -- wli
>
>
> Index: mm-2.6.21-rc5-4/include/linux/resource.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.21-rc5-4.orig/include/linux/resource.h 2007-04-03 23:31:19.000000000 -0700
> +++ mm-2.6.21-rc5-4/include/linux/resource.h 2007-04-04 13:08:47.000000000 -0700
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
> */
> #define RUSAGE_SELF 0
> #define RUSAGE_CHILDREN (-1)
> -#define RUSAGE_BOTH (-2) /* sys_wait4() uses this */
> +#define RUSAGE_THREAD (-2)
> +#define RUSAGE_BOTH (-3) /* sys_wait4() uses this */
>
> struct rusage {
> struct timeval ru_utime; /* user time used */
> Index: mm-2.6.21-rc5-4/kernel/sys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mm-2.6.21-rc5-4.orig/kernel/sys.c 2007-04-03 23:33:27.000000000 -0700
> +++ mm-2.6.21-rc5-4/kernel/sys.c 2007-04-04 13:11:17.000000000 -0700
> @@ -2074,6 +2074,16 @@
> }
>
> switch (who) {
> + case RUSAGE_THREAD:
> + utime = p->utime;
> + stime = p->stime;
> + r->ru_nvcsw = p->nvcsw;
> + r->ru_nivcsw = p->nivcsw;
> + r->ru_minflt = p->min_flt;
> + r->ru_majflt = p->maj_flt;
> + r->ru_inblock = task_io_get_inblock(p);
> + r->ru_oublock = task_io_get_oublock(p);
> + break;
> case RUSAGE_BOTH:
> case RUSAGE_CHILDREN:
> utime = p->signal->cutime;
> @@ -2131,7 +2141,8 @@
>
> asmlinkage long sys_getrusage(int who, struct rusage __user *ru)
> {
> - if (who != RUSAGE_SELF && who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN)
> + if (who != RUSAGE_SELF && who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN &&
> + who != RUSAGE_THREAD)
> return -EINVAL;
> return getrusage(current, who, ru);
> }
Seems sane. Could we please get it tested and get a full description in
place? Something which provides enough detail for the manpage maintainers.
Also, a quick comparison between Linux's RUSAGE_THREAD and $other-os's
implementations would reduce the possibility of silly, cast-in-stone
incompatabilities.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-09 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 17:29 per-thread rusage William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-04 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 18:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-09 23:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-10 0:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-10 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 1:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-10 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-01 17:29 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 18:39 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 20:24 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 22:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-01 22:34 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 23:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-01 23:17 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-02 5:05 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-02 0:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-02 4:31 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-02 4:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 22:29 ` Bill Irwin
2007-04-04 22:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-05 4:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-10 20:10 Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070409165315.4704021f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox