From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>,
Linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Preemption Broken: centrino_target busted under SMP on 2.6.20.4
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 19:41:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070409194142.88f0a5e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410023108.GA14081@redhat.com>
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 22:31:08 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:26:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:50:34 -0400
> > Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
> > > index f43b987..824d0a2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
> > > +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c
> > > @@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ static int centrino_target (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > saved_mask = current->cpus_allowed;
> > > first_cpu = 1;
> > > cpus_clear(covered_cpus);
> > > + preempt_disable();
> > > for_each_cpu_mask(j, online_policy_cpus) {
> > > /*
> > > * Support for SMP systems.
> > > @@ -798,6 +799,7 @@ static int centrino_target (struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > }
> > >
> > > migrate_end:
> > > + preempt_enable();
> > > set_cpus_allowed(current, saved_mask);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> >
> > This means we'll call set_cpus_allowed() while in atomic state, but
> > set_cpus_allowed() does sleepy stuff.
>
> Puzzled. This diff shouldn't change anything about the context we're in
> when we call set_cpus_allowed, and as we're not seeing warnings now,
> I'm not sure what I'm missing?
set_cpus_allowed() will only sleep in special circumstances: when we're
telling the target task that it is not allwed to run on a CPU upon which it
is presently executing. So it needs to be synchronously migrated off that
CPU, which requires that the set_cpus_allowed() caller block.
You're probably just not hitting that case.
Probably we should have a might_sleep() in set_cpus_allowed(), although
there might be callers who are guaranteeed to never hit that case and who
might legitimately want special treatment to avoid the warning.
> [which may be 'the obvious', you wouldn't believe the evening I've had
> involving gas leaks and noxious fumes. Wheee, floaty head.]
Yeah, I get a lot of patches like that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-05 20:33 Preemption Broken: centrino_target busted under SMP on 2.6.20.4 Jeff V. Merkey
2007-04-05 20:50 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-10 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 2:31 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-10 2:41 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-10 3:05 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-10 3:08 ` Dave Jones
2007-04-10 3:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 4:29 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070409194142.88f0a5e5.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox