From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753572AbXDIWhY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 18:37:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753544AbXDIWhX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 18:37:23 -0400 Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:45740 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753553AbXDIWhW (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 18:37:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:37:27 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: still curious about that CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING option Message-ID: <20070409223727.GA28370@stusta.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:21:27PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > i'm curious -- has there been any decision about the config option > of FORCED_INLINING? the feature removal file suggests it should have > disappeared last year. is it still doing something useful? It never did anything. > rday cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed