public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: align rq to cacheline boundary
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:37:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704100937.01399.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070409134057.2d249f0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


> >  
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues) ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> 
> Remember that this can consume up to (linesize-4 * NR_CPUS) bytes, 

On x86 just the real possible map now -- that tends to be much smaller.

There might be some other architectures who still allocate per cpu
for all of NR_CPUs (or always set possible map to that), but those
should be just fixed.

> which is 
> rather a lot.

We should have solved the problem of limited per cpu space in .22 at least
with some patches by Jeremy. I also plan a few other changes the will
use more per CPU memory again.

> Remember also that the linesize on VSMP is 4k.
> 
> And that putting a gap in the per-cpu memory like this will reduce its
> overall cache-friendliness.

When he avoids false sharing on remote wakeup it should be more cache friendly.

> Need more convincing, please.

Was this based on some benchmark where it showed?

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-10  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-09 18:08 [patch] sched: align rq to cacheline boundary Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-09 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-09 21:53   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-04-09 22:17     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-10  5:00       ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2007-04-10  6:36   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-10 23:47     ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-10  7:37   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-10  6:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-10 16:40   ` Siddha, Suresh B

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704100937.01399.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox