Re: [patch 2/8] [Intel IOMMU] Some generic search functions required to lookup device relationships.

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:11:38PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 20:46 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:55:54PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * find the upstream PCIE-to-PCI bridge of a PCI device
> > > + * if the device is PCIE, return NULL
> > > + * if the device isn't connected to a PCIE bridge (that is its parent is a
> > > + * legacy PCI bridge and the bridge is directly connected to bus 0), return its
> > > + * parent
> > > + */
> > > +struct pci_dev *
> > > +pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct pci_dev *tmp = NULL;
> > > +
> > > +	if (pdev->is_pcie)
> > > +		return NULL;
> > > +	while (1) {
> > > +		if (!pdev->bus->self)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		pdev = pdev->bus->self;
> > > +		/* a p2p bridge */
> > > +		if (!pdev->is_pcie) {
> > > +			tmp = pdev;
> > > +			continue;
> > > +		}
> > > +		/* PCI device should connect to a PCIE bridge */
> > > +		BUG_ON(pdev->pcie_type != PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE);
> > > +		return pdev;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	return tmp;
> > > +}
> > 
> > No locking while you walk up the bus list?
> hmm, iommu driver didn't support pci hotplug in current stage. But we
> can add lock here.

Please do, as PCI-E hotplug is much more common than PCI hotplug these
days (think ExpressCard in millions of laptops...)

> > > --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/include/linux/pci.h	2007-04-03 04:30:51.000000000 -0700
> > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/include/linux/pci.h	2007-04-03 06:58:58.000000000 -0700
> > > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@
> > >  	unsigned short	subsystem_device;
> > >  	unsigned int	class;		/* 3 bytes: (base,sub,prog-if) */
> > >  	u8		hdr_type;	/* PCI header type (`multi' flag masked out) */
> > > +	u8		pcie_type;	/* PCI-E device/port type */
> > >  	u8		rom_base_reg;	/* which config register controls the ROM */
> > >  	u8		pin;  		/* which interrupt pin this device uses */
> > >  
> > > @@ -168,6 +169,7 @@
> > >  	unsigned int 	msi_enabled:1;
> > >  	unsigned int	msix_enabled:1;
> > >  	unsigned int	is_managed:1;
> > > +	unsigned int	is_pcie:1;
> > 
> > Do you really need both fields?  Wouldn't just the pcie_type one work
> > (with some NOT_PCIE type being set for it if it isn't I suppose.)
> There are some encodings are reserved for future. Just don't want to use
> reserved bits, as we don't know which one is proper for NOT_PCIE.

What are the current encodings?  I don't have my copy of the pci spec
availble at the moment...

thanks,

greg k-h