From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [-mm3 PATCH] (Retry) Check the return value of kobject_add and etc.
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:45:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070411064525.GC4343@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410151815.906ef9b4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 03:18:15PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:08:29 +0800
>WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Since kobject_add, sysfs_create_link and sysfs_create_file are marked as '__must_check', we must always check their return values.
>>
<snip>
>
>Your mail client replaces tabs with spaces - please fix it.
>
Oh, I did't notice that. Thank you. I will fix it soon.
>The code duplication is unpleasing. We normally do this as below (please
>review this code).
>
Er, I see.
>Note that I changed it to not send the KOBJ_REMOVE if we didn't send a
>KOBJ_ADD.
>
I think you are right.
>
>From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
>
>Since kobject_add, sysfs_create_link and sysfs_create_file are marked as
>'__must_check', we must always check their return values.
>
>Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
>Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
>Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>---
>
> fs/partitions/check.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff -puN fs/partitions/check.c~partitions-check-the-return-value-of-kobject_add-etc fs/partitions/check.c
>--- a/fs/partitions/check.c~partitions-check-the-return-value-of-kobject_add-etc
>+++ a/fs/partitions/check.c
>@@ -383,26 +383,41 @@ void add_partition(struct gendisk *disk,
> p->policy = disk->policy;
>
> if (isdigit(disk->kobj.name[strlen(disk->kobj.name)-1]))
>- snprintf(p->kobj.name,KOBJ_NAME_LEN,"%sp%d",disk->kobj.name,part);
>+ snprintf(p->kobj.name, KOBJ_NAME_LEN, "%sp%d",
>+ disk->kobj.name, part);
^^^
Andrew, it seems that you left an additional whitespace in the above line (marked as ^^^).
> else
>- snprintf(p->kobj.name,KOBJ_NAME_LEN,"%s%d",disk->kobj.name,part);
>+ snprintf(p->kobj.name, KOBJ_NAME_LEN, "%s%d",
>+ disk->kobj.name, part);
^^^
Also here. ;-p
> p->kobj.parent = &disk->kobj;
> p->kobj.ktype = &ktype_part;
> kobject_init(&p->kobj);
>- kobject_add(&p->kobj);
>+ if (kobject_add(&p->kobj))
>+ goto out_put;
> if (!disk->part_uevent_suppress)
> kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
>- sysfs_create_link(&p->kobj, &block_subsys.kset.kobj, "subsystem");
>+ if (sysfs_create_link(&p->kobj, &block_subsys.kset.kobj, "subsystem"))
>+ goto out_uevent;
> if (flags & ADDPART_FLAG_WHOLEDISK) {
> static struct attribute addpartattr = {
> .name = "whole_disk",
> .mode = S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH,
> };
>
>- sysfs_create_file(&p->kobj, &addpartattr);
>+ if (sysfs_create_file(&p->kobj, &addpartattr))
>+ goto out_link;
> }
> partition_sysfs_add_subdir(p);
> disk->part[part-1] = p;
>+ return;
>+
>+out_link:
>+ sysfs_remove_link(&p->kobj, "subsystem");
>+out_uevent:
>+ if (!disk->part_uevent_suppress)
>+ kobject_uevent(&p->kobj, KOBJ_REMOVE);
>+ kobject_del(&p->kobj);
>+out_put:
>+ kobject_put(&p->kobj);
> }
>
> static char *make_block_name(struct gendisk *disk)
>_
Your code is better. Thanks again!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-11 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-01 7:32 [-mm3 PATCH] (Retry) Check the return value of kobject_add and etc Cong WANG
2007-04-02 11:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-05 4:54 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-05 9:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-05 14:44 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-05 15:05 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-05 15:27 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-05 16:00 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-06 2:53 ` WANG Cong
2007-04-10 12:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-10 12:35 ` [Patch -mm] kobject: kobject_add() reference leak Cornelia Huck
2007-04-10 14:08 ` [-mm3 PATCH] (Retry) Check the return value of kobject_add and etc WANG Cong
2007-04-10 22:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 6:45 ` WANG Cong [this message]
2007-04-11 7:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 9:24 ` Cornelia Huck
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-01 8:22 Parag Warudkar
2007-04-01 13:46 ` Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070411064525.GC4343@localhost.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox