* [patch] x86_64: more fixes to node_possible_map runtime setup
[not found] ` <20070409231328.GE3948@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
@ 2007-04-11 23:30 ` Siddha, Suresh B
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Siddha, Suresh B @ 2007-04-11 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm; +Cc: rientjes, andi, clameter, dada1, linux-kernel
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:13:28PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 03:05:01PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > Subject: x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime fix
> > From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> >
> > Clear node_possible_map if numa_emulation() fails for some reason, such as
> > a failed hash shift, but setup_node_range() has already set some fake nodes
> > as online.
>
> David, Looking at your fix, I think we require more fixes in this area.
> Please review the appended patch. Thanks.
Andrew, Please apply the appended patch. Goes on top of the
x86_64-set-node_possible_map-at-runtime-fix.patch
thanks, suresh
---
Subject: [patch] x86_64: more fixes to node_possible_map runtime setup
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
More fixes in the failure cases and a small cleanup in numa emulation case.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
---
--- linux-2.6.21-rc6/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c~ 2007-04-09 15:59:03.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc6/arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c 2007-04-09 17:44:38.000000000 -0700
@@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ static int __init setup_node_range(int n
ret = -1;
}
nodes[nid].end = *addr;
- node_set_online(nid);
node_set(nid, node_possible_map);
printk(KERN_INFO "Faking node %d at %016Lx-%016Lx (%LuMB)\n", nid,
nodes[nid].start, nodes[nid].end,
@@ -483,7 +482,7 @@ out:
* SRAT.
*/
remove_all_active_ranges();
- for_each_online_node(i) {
+ for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) {
e820_register_active_regions(i, nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
@@ -510,11 +509,13 @@ void __init numa_initmem_init(unsigned l
if (!numa_off && !acpi_scan_nodes(start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT))
return;
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_K8_NUMA
if (!numa_off && !k8_scan_nodes(start_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT, end_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT))
return;
+ nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
#endif
printk(KERN_INFO "%s\n",
numa_off ? "NUMA turned off" : "No NUMA configuration found");
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread