public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@novell.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 11:36:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704121136.03098.ak@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070411173902.b2a9ab9d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>


> OK, so I resurrected x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch and
> x86_64-mm-sched-clock64.patch.  The x86_64 box hangs on boot when using
> netconsole and printk timestamps too.  Removing "time" from the kernel boot
> command line prevents that.

Ah. But ktime_get shouldn't printk. Or did you change that?

> 
> This explains why the hang only happens with
> x86_64-mm-log-reason-why-tsc-was-marked-unstable.patch applied, too: that
> patch must be triggering a printk inside xtime_lock.
> 
> Does someone want to cook up a lockless printk_clock() for i386 and x86_64?

Just use jiffies directly in printk. That's only HZ accurate, but should
be good enough for printk.  

One could use pure monotonic xtime as fallback instead of ktime_get in sched_clock. 
The trouble is  just that they might cause sched_clock to go backwards during 
a temporary instability period (cpufreq change) because the xtime will be 
always a bit behind the TSC and a TSC->xtime conversion will lose time.
At least the scheduler doesn't handle backwards time warp on a CPU gratefully.
Ok I guess it could  return max(last_value_before_instability, xtime) 

-Andi



  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-12  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-11 16:29 [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier Daniel Walker
2007-04-11 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 20:54   ` Daniel Walker
2007-04-11 21:33     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12  0:39       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12  9:36         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-12 16:23           ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 16:45             ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:00               ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 17:43                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:46                   ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:52                   ` Daniel Walker
2007-04-12 17:55                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 18:27                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 19:41                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 19:43                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:41               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:45                 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 19:46                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 20:15                     ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:17         ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704121136.03098.ak@novell.com \
    --to=ak@novell.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox