From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
To: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:31:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070412143131.GP13621@kvack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b040c32a0704120050h5b4f03d3ve8813d96c18e082f@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:50:39AM -0700, Ken Chen wrote:
> I ran through the autotest (with bug fix in the test code). It passes
> the regression tests. I made the following change since last rev:
By removing the spinlock around ring insertion, you've made it possible
for two events being inserted on different CPUs to end up creating
inconsistent state, as there is nothing which guarantees that resulting
event in the ring will be wholely one event or another.
Also, I don't like rounding up of the number of events to the nearest power
of two, as it can round things up significantly more than just going to the
end of the last actual page of memory allocated.
NAK.
-ben
PS base64 encoded patches are incredibly difficult to quote.
--
"Time is of no importance, Mr. President, only life is important."
Don't Email: <zyntrop@kvack.org>.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-12 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-10 23:53 [patch] convert aio event reap to use atomic-op instead of spin_lock Ken Chen
2007-04-11 5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 16:54 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-11 18:15 ` Zach Brown
2007-04-11 18:29 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-11 18:00 ` Zach Brown
2007-04-11 19:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 19:34 ` Zach Brown
2007-04-11 19:28 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-11 19:44 ` Zach Brown
2007-04-11 19:45 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-04-11 19:52 ` Zach Brown
2007-04-11 20:03 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-04-12 7:29 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-12 12:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2007-04-13 0:57 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-13 1:08 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-12 7:50 ` Ken Chen
2007-04-12 14:31 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2007-04-12 15:13 ` Benjamin LaHaise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070412143131.GP13621@kvack.org \
--to=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox