From: Andi Kleen <ak@novell.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:45:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704121945.54053.ak@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <461E6F5F.1030008@goop.org>
On Thursday 12 April 2007 19:41:51 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Ok. I think it's better to just fix sched_clock() again than to
> > add another one. I can probably
> > eliminate the ktime_get() and use something based on jiffies. That will
> > be inaccurate for the instable case of course.
> >
> > I will do that later today.
>
> sched_clock seems a bit weird to use. In the pv_ops world, it only
> counts unstolen time, and it is therefore inherently per-cpu. The
> timestamps should be at least system-wide monotonic.
Even on real hardware it's also per CPU, although the errors
are usually not big. At least the scheduler deals with that by
only ever comparing time stamps from the same CPU.
If you have big deviations between CPUs then it might cause problems
for non scheduler uses. I guess printk_clock is not critical, but
it might be a little confusing.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-12 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-11 16:29 [PATCH] i386 tsc: remove xtime_lock'ing around cpufreq notifier Daniel Walker
2007-04-11 20:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-11 20:54 ` Daniel Walker
2007-04-11 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 0:39 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 9:36 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 16:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 16:45 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 17:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:46 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:52 ` Daniel Walker
2007-04-12 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-12 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 19:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 19:43 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 17:45 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-12 19:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-12 20:15 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-12 17:17 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704121945.54053.ak@novell.com \
--to=ak@novell.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox