From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lenb@kernel.org, "linux-acpi@vger" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:59:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070413155949.GA9157@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704071308.07571.david-b@pacbell.net>
Hi!
> > Are you _sure_ you have a 1-to-1 relationship here? No multiple devices
> > pointing to the same acpi node? Or the other way around? If so, you
> > are going to have to change the name to be something more unique.
>
> I've wondered that too. The short answer: APCI only supports 1-1
> here. It will emit warnings if it tries to bind more than one ACPI
...
> Assuming they all adopt that same "parallel tree" model, that seems
> like a good idea. The tools will likely need to understand how ACPI
> and OF differ, but there's no point in reserving more names than we
> really need. Though it may be that "parallel trees" should go away.
If mapping is indeed 1-to-1 in acpi... it would be nice to just merge
the trees.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-15 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 0:41 [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful David Brownell
2007-04-05 7:59 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-05 10:58 ` David Brownell
2007-04-06 9:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-06 15:43 ` David Brownell
2007-04-07 5:01 ` Greg KH
2007-04-07 20:08 ` David Brownell
2007-04-09 2:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-09 5:35 ` David Brownell
2007-04-10 23:29 ` David Brownell
2007-04-11 0:10 ` David Brownell
2007-04-13 15:59 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-04-17 19:53 ` David Brownell
2007-04-17 21:57 ` David Brownell
2007-04-18 3:03 ` Greg KH
2007-04-18 3:25 ` David Brownell
2007-04-05 9:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-05 10:35 ` David Brownell
2007-04-25 19:22 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070413155949.GA9157@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox