Re: so what *is* obsolete and removable?

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:39:10 +0200 Tilman Schmidt wrote:

> Am 15.04.2007 22:55 schrieb Robert P. J. Day:
> >   as i recall, the isdn4linux was *un*obsoleted, wasn't it?
> 
> Actually, it wasn't.
> 
> We *did* reach a consensus that isdn4linux is not obsolete in the
> accepted sense of the word, because there is no replacement for it
> so far.
> 
> OTOH I have since submitted (twice, in fact) a patch that would remove
> the "(obsolete)" label from the Kconfig entry, but somehow nothing
> ever became of it. My submissions just linger in LKML, uncommented and
> unmerged.

Did you submit the patch to Andrew Morton?
Is the patch in the -mm patchset?
Did Karsten ack the patch?

If the patch is in -mm and it's not critical (like this subject),
then it probably won't be merged until after 2.6.21 is released...


> To sum it up, we agree that the "(obsolete)" label is wrong, but we
> won't remove it. I have no idea how to resolve that situation.
> 
> What I do know is that it would be very wrong to remove isdn4linux,
> because it has an existing userbase with nowhere else to go.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***