From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752427AbXDQH6U (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:58:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752443AbXDQH6U (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:58:20 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41890 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752427AbXDQH6T (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 03:58:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:58:00 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Nick Piggin Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Davide Libenzi , Peter Williams , Mike Galbraith , Con Kolivas , ck list , Bill Huey , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] Message-ID: <20070417075800.GA5076@elte.hu> References: <1176776941.6222.21.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070417034050.GD25513@wotan.suse.de> <46244A52.4000403@bigpond.net.au> <20070417042954.GG25513@wotan.suse.de> <20070417060955.GO8915@holomorphy.com> <20070417061503.GC1057@wotan.suse.de> <20070417070949.GR8915@holomorphy.com> <20070417073308.GB30559@elte.hu> <20070417074021.GB20026@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070417074021.GB20026@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nick Piggin wrote: > > Anyone who thinks that there exists only two kinds of code: 100% > > correct and 100% incorrect with no shades of grey inbetween is in > > reality a sort of an extremist: whom, depending on mood and > > affection, we could call either a 'coding purist' or a 'coding > > taliban' ;-) > > Only if you are an extremist-naming extremist with no shades of grey. > Others, like myself, also include 'coding al-qaeda' and 'coding john > howard' in that scale. heh ;) You, you ... nitpicking extremist! ;) And beware that you just commited another act of extremism too: > I agree there. because you just went to the extreme position of saying that "i agree with this portion 100%", instead of saying "this seems to be 91.5% correct in my opinion, Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:40:25 +0200". and the nasty thing is, that in reality even shades of grey, if you print them out, are just a set of extreme black dots on an extreme white sheet of paper! ;) [ so i guess we've got to consider the scope of extremism too: the larger the scope, the more limiting and hence the more dangerous it is. ] Ingo