From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031149AbXDQQZP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:25:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031154AbXDQQZP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:25:15 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.103] ([212.12.190.103]:33030 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031149AbXDQQZO (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:25:14 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:29:00 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200704150931.42268.a1426z@gawab.com> In-Reply-To: <200704150931.42268.a1426z@gawab.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704171929.00258.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > Anyone who thinks that there exists only two kinds of code: 100% correct > and 100% incorrect with no shades of grey inbetween is in reality a sort > of an extremist: whom, depending on mood and affection, we could call > either a 'coding purist' or a 'coding taliban' ;-) I am not sure what you mean by this?!? It's probably well known that nothing is perfect, even if you tried, but to use this to excuse sub-optimal coding sounds rather lame. Now, admitting that everything may be fixable, would have been a much more reasonable response. Thanks! -- Al