From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fix abs() macro to work with types wider than int
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:43:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070419084339.418dbe69.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070419092339.GA13569@dwarf.suse.cz>
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:23:39 +0200 Jiri Bohac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason to use an explicit int instead of a typeof in
> the abs() macro? The current implementation will return bogus
> results when used with longs.
I think it's like it is just to be consistent with abs() in C,
which also contains labs() and llabs().
> How about changing the int to a typeof like this?:
>
>
>
> Fix the abs() macro to work with wider types than int.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
>
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/include/linux/kernel.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ extern int cond_resched(void);
> #define might_sleep_if(cond) do { if (cond) might_sleep(); } while (0)
>
> #define abs(x) ({ \
> - int __x = (x); \
> + typeof(x) __x = (x); \
> (__x < 0) ? -__x : __x; \
> })
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
> SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-19 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-19 9:23 [RFC][PATCH] fix abs() macro to work with types wider than int Jiri Bohac
2007-04-19 15:43 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2007-04-20 12:44 ` Richard Knutsson
2007-04-25 15:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-04-25 15:26 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-04-25 15:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-04-25 23:42 ` John Anthony Kazos Jr.
2007-04-25 18:24 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-04-25 20:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2007-04-25 20:30 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-04-25 21:57 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070419084339.418dbe69.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox