From: Michael Gerdau <mgd@technosis.de>
To: ck@vds.kolivas.org
Cc: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ck] [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.43
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:37:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704191737.55990.mgd@technosis.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704200112.36465.kernel@kolivas.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1176 bytes --]
> In order to keep raising the standard for comparison for the alternative new
> scheduler developments, here is an updated version of the staircase deadline
> cpu scheduler.
I very much appreciate your continued work on SD.
Over the last days I had used 26.21-rc7-ck1 and -ck2. Today I have
given sd0.42 a try and my system "feels" more responsive with my
everyday tasks. No hard facts just my very subjective usage experience.
I'm on an Intel Core2 T7600 2.33GHz, 4GB, openSUSE 10.2, KDE
Workload are occasional compilejobs as well as regular Perl
numbercrunching scripts while having amarok playing music.
No noticeable desktop freezes or anything else. With -ck1/2 I had
occasional visual freezes/delays.
I think I still like SD better than the "old" -ck.
I'll give 2.6.21-rc7-sd0.43 a try later today (i.e. when it has
finished been built).
Best,
Michael
--
Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar
Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg
Vote against SPAM - see http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Michael Gerdau email: mgd@technosis.de
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-19 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-19 15:12 [ANNOUNCE] Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler version 0.43 Con Kolivas
2007-04-19 15:37 ` Michael Gerdau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704191737.55990.mgd@technosis.de \
--to=mgd@technosis.de \
--cc=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox