From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766976AbXDST6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:58:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1766978AbXDST6q (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:58:46 -0400 Received: from iucha.net ([209.98.146.184]:48426 "EHLO mail.iucha.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766976AbXDST6q (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:58:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:58:45 -0500 To: Trond Myklebust Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Adrian Bunk , OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Failure! Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues Message-ID: <20070419195844.GT24044@iucha.net> References: <20070418123842.GF24044@iucha.net> <1176902131.6796.62.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070418134225.GG24044@iucha.net> <1176905506.6796.84.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419015232.GO24044@iucha.net> <1176950713.6422.95.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <462786C9.7090405@oracle.com> <1176995848.6663.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419155046.GR24044@iucha.net> <1176998982.6663.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pnDjx0H/VpusRTEI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1176998982.6663.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> X-GPG-Key: http://iucha.net/florin_iucha.gpg X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5E59 C2E7 941E B592 3BA4 7DCF 343D 2B14 2376 6F5B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --pnDjx0H/VpusRTEI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:09:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > See > http://client.linux-nfs.org/Linux-2.6.x/2.6.21-rc7/ >=20 > I'm giving the first 5 patches of that series (i.e. > linux-2.6.21-001-cleanup_unstable_write.dif to > linux-2.6.21-005-fix_nfsv4_resend.dif) an extra beating since those are > the ones that I feel should go into 2.6.21 final in order to fix the > read/write regressions that have been reported. They should be identical > to the patches that I posted on lkml in the past 3 days. >=20 > Please feel free to grab them and give them a test. The copy completed some time ago, but now I cannot ssh into the box! This is a new development, as before I was always able to ssh into, even when the copy slowed down to a trickle. I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right? Regards, florin --=20 Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 --pnDjx0H/VpusRTEI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJ8n0ND0rFCN2b1sRAtVGAJ9zHIAljVI2GgaRx7g7O710rQ/unQCffftg pnCcHgHf/mvU6BRPybGuwpA= =OxRK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pnDjx0H/VpusRTEI--