From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767030AbXDSVte (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:49:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767015AbXDSVte (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:49:34 -0400 Received: from iucha.net ([209.98.146.184]:33644 "EHLO mail.iucha.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767030AbXDSVtd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:49:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:49:32 -0500 To: Trond Myklebust Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Adrian Bunk , OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Failure! Re: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues Message-ID: <20070419214931.GX24044@iucha.net> References: <20070418134225.GG24044@iucha.net> <1176905506.6796.84.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419015232.GO24044@iucha.net> <1176950713.6422.95.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <462786C9.7090405@oracle.com> <1176995848.6663.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419155046.GR24044@iucha.net> <1176998982.6663.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419195844.GT24044@iucha.net> <1177018242.6628.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177018242.6628.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> X-GPG-Key: http://iucha.net/florin_iucha.gpg X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5E59 C2E7 941E B592 3BA4 7DCF 343D 2B14 2376 6F5B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests > > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the > > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your > > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right? >=20 > The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4 > request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has > occurred, or the server sends us garbage. I have to mention that I rebased to the head of the tree (895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a) before applying your patches, in order to test what I expect the official tree to be. Tonight I'll test this kernel once more, then go back to 21-rc7 and apply your 5 patches and re-test. florin --=20 Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 --QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGJ+PrND0rFCN2b1sRAijkAJ41DvDoMYJqs7A8P3iL4GwjB55/CwCeNfO3 2m+upqv1iov+UpNJzmzsHwM= =h19d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QQ0dNM4HnH4+xgqD--