public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:21:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070420102157.GD1695@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070420085354.GP32602149@melbourne.sgi.com>

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 06:53:54PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
...
> Yes, after spending another two hours working out why my fix was
> then hanging in cancel_rearming_delayed_work() I was a little bit
> annoyed at the now obviously misleading comment. Five minutes later

I agree with your feelings, but strictly speaking it's not "obviously
misleading":

" * cancel_rearming_delayed_work - reliably kill off a delayed
keventd work whose handler rearms the delayed work."

And all your rearmed works were, probably, reliably killed!

> I'd fixed the bug properly. A better comment would have saved me two
> hours of wasted time.....

It seems to be an Achilles' heel of linux... 

Regards,
Jarek P.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-20 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-19  6:54 [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-19  7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-19  8:28   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-19 14:48   ` David Chinner
2007-04-19 14:46 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20  8:13   ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-20  8:53     ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 10:21       ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-04-20 11:01         ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 12:12           ` [PATCH] workqueue: cancel_rearming_delayed_work/workqueue usage warning Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-20 17:23             ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23  9:41               ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-19 17:07 ` [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-20  7:14   ` Jarek Poplawski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-20 11:09 Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070420102157.GD1695@ff.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox