From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:09:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070420110954.GA3640@ff.dom.local> (raw)
(take 2)
I'm not sure we've agreed enough, who'll resubmit, so here
it is with WARN_ON. If it was submited already - forget it.
Jarek P.
--->
IMHO cancel_rearming_delayed_work is dangerous place:
- it assumes a work function always rearms (with no exception),
which probably isn't explained enough now (but anyway should
be checked in such loops);
- probably possible (theoretical) scenario: a few work
functions rearm themselves with very short, equal times;
before flush_workqueue ends, their timers are already
fired, so cancel_delayed_work has nothing to do.
Maybe this patch could check, if I'm not dreaming...
PS: of course the counter value below is a question of taste
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.21-rc6-mm1-/kernel/workqueue.c 2.6.21-rc6-mm1/kernel/workqueue.c
--- 2.6.21-rc6-mm1-/kernel/workqueue.c 2007-04-18 20:07:45.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.21-rc6-mm1/kernel/workqueue.c 2007-04-18 20:15:44.000000000 +0200
@@ -557,9 +557,12 @@ void cancel_rearming_delayed_work(struct
/* Was it ever queued ? */
if (cwq != NULL) {
struct workqueue_struct *wq = cwq->wq;
+ int i = 1000;
- while (!cancel_delayed_work(dwork))
+ while (!cancel_delayed_work(dwork)) {
flush_workqueue(wq);
+ WARN_ON(!i--);
+ }
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cancel_rearming_delayed_work);
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-20 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-20 11:09 Jarek Poplawski [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-19 6:54 [PATCH -mm] workqueue: debug possible endless loop in cancel_rearming_delayed_work Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-19 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-19 8:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-19 14:48 ` David Chinner
2007-04-19 14:46 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 8:13 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-20 8:53 ` David Chinner
2007-04-20 10:21 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-20 11:01 ` David Chinner
2007-04-19 17:07 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-04-20 7:14 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070420110954.GA3640@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox