From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1767101AbXDTNab (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:30:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1767100AbXDTNab (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:30:31 -0400 Received: from iucha.net ([209.98.146.184]:35972 "EHLO mail.iucha.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767101AbXDTNaa (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:30:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:30:28 -0500 To: Trond Myklebust Cc: chuck.lever@oracle.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Adrian Bunk , OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Success! Was: [PATCH 0/4] 2.6.21-rc7 NFS writes: fix a series of issues Message-ID: <20070420133028.GA24044@iucha.net> References: <1176905506.6796.84.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419015232.GO24044@iucha.net> <1176950713.6422.95.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <462786C9.7090405@oracle.com> <1176995848.6663.1.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419155046.GR24044@iucha.net> <1176998982.6663.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419195844.GT24044@iucha.net> <1177018242.6628.10.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070419214931.GX24044@iucha.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+9kyDs7IugQ0lHaC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070419214931.GX24044@iucha.net> X-GPG-Key: http://iucha.net/florin_iucha.gpg X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5E59 C2E7 941E B592 3BA4 7DCF 343D 2B14 2376 6F5B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: florin@iucha.net (Florin Iucha) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --+9kyDs7IugQ0lHaC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 04:49:31PM -0500, Florin Iucha wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:30:42PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > I'm far from the machine right now, so I will do some more tests > > > tonight, but right now, the new patchset is not good. What is the > > > difference between reverting the patch you sent yesterday and your > > > current fifth patch? I assume the other four are identical, right? > >=20 > > The only difference is the way in which we handle retries of an NFSv4 > > request: the new patch disconnects if and only if a timeout has > > occurred, or the server sends us garbage. >=20 > I have to mention that I rebased to the head of the tree > (895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a) before applying your > patches, in order to test what I expect the official tree to be. >=20 > Tonight I'll test this kernel once more, then go back to 21-rc7 and > apply your 5 patches and re-test. It passed big-copy, and the copy run from the gnome-session while I did my morning light browsing, email reading, etc. kernel: 895e1fc7226e6732bc77138955b6c7dfa279f57a patches: linux-2.6.21-001-cleanup_unstable_write.dif linux-2.6.21-002-defer_clearing_pg_writeback.dif linux-2.6.21-003-fix_desynchronised_ncommit.dif linux-2.6.21-004-fix_nfs_set_page_dirty.dif linux-2.6.21-005-fix_nfsv4_resend.dif Regards, florin --=20 Bruce Schneier expects the Spanish Inquisition. http://geekz.co.uk/schneierfacts/fact/163 --+9kyDs7IugQ0lHaC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGKMB0ND0rFCN2b1sRAiQlAJ4pxXeoyifGTTK+tDV7bM+q7N05zwCgjuL9 Zt/OrpAfXFoKpnjfRAC+cvo= =G/iu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+9kyDs7IugQ0lHaC--