Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

Ingo Molnar
2007-04-21T19:01:26Z

* Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:

> > i've attached it below in a standalone form, feel free to put it
> > into SD! :)
>
> Assume X went crazy (lacking any statistics, I make the unproven
> statement that this happens more often than kthreads going berserk),
> then having it niced with minus something is not too nice.

i've not experienced a 'runaway X' personally, at most it would crash or
lock up ;) The value is boot-time and sysctl configurable as well back
to 0.

Ingo