Re: [REPORT] cfs-v4 vs sd-0.44

Ingo Molnar
2007-04-24T07:25:44Z

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> yeah, i guess this has little to do with X. I think in your scenario
> it might have been smarter to either stop, or to renice the workloads
> that took away CPU power from others to _positive_ nice levels.
> Negative nice levels can indeed be dangerous.

btw., was X itself at nice 0 or nice -10 when the lockup happened?

Ingo