public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vatsa@in.ibm.com,
	paulmck@us.ibm.com, pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/3] freezer: Introduce freezer_flags
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:49:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070423141908.GA6842@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0704222109t5c92e4d6t280c21b256945ac8@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Satyam, 
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:39:30AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> >+/*
> >+ *     Per task flags used by the freezer
> >+ *
> >+ *     They should not be referred to directly outside of this file.
> >+ */
> >+#define TFF_NOFREEZE   0       /* task should not be frozen */
> >+#define TFF_FREEZE     8       /* task should go to the refrigerator ASAP 
> >*/
> >+#define TFF_SKIP       9       /* do not count this task as freezable */
> >+#define TFF_FROZEN     10      /* task is frozen */
> 
> Aren't NOFREEZE and SKIP doing the same thing? One of them appears
> superfluous. I'm looking at 21-rc6-mm1 and vfork(2) seems to be its
> only user. Seeing how vfork(2) used it, can't the call to
> freezer_do_not_count() be replaced with a call to freezer_exempt()?
> Similarly, the freezer_count() after the wait_for_completion might
> just as well be a clear of the NOFREEZE bit followed by a
> try_to_freeze(). Could you please explain the rationale behind the
> SKIP flag?

The difference between the NOFREEZE and the SKIP flag is a subtle one.

When a task (say p) sets it's NOFREEZE flag, it tells the freezer not to
consider it for freezing. Which means freezeable(p) will return 0.
So the freezer will not even mark it for freezing. 

However, when a task sets it SKIP flag, it tells the freezer - "I might
block at a safe place. So when you are counting the processes which
have been marked as freezeable, but have not frozen yet, please don't
count me in. IOW, please skip me."  
Thus such a task can still be marked for freezing.

The typical usage is 
freezer_do_not_count(current);
/* currents goes to an uninterruptible sleep, like wait_for_completion. */
freezer_count(current);

Once the task wakes up from it's uninterruptible sleep, it will 
call freezer_count which in turn calls try_to_freeze.
If the task was marked for freezing, it will be frozen now.

You may want to check the thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/18/47 
on how it came into existance.

> 
> Cheers,
> Satyam

Regards
gautham.
-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-23 14:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-19 12:01 [RFC 0/2] Fix Freezer related races Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-19 12:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Fix PF_NOFREEZE and freezeable race Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-19 21:39   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 18:02     ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 10:26       ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-23 17:49         ` Oleg Nesterov
     [not found]         ` <200704260044.03975.rjw@sisk.pl>
     [not found]           ` <20070425231638.GH15134@in.ibm.com>
     [not found]             ` <20070425163409.4f8476c4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
     [not found]               ` <20070426060608.GA12892@in.ibm.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20070425231232.302a83f0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-26 13:11                   ` [PATCH -mm] Move frozen_process() to kernel/power/process.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-26 12:36                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-26 13:40                       ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-19 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH(experimental) 2/2] Fix freezer-kthread_stop race Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-19 21:31   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20  8:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 11:05       ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-20 11:59         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 12:26           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-20 12:50             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 17:30             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 18:31               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-20 21:13                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-22 19:28                 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 0/3] Separate freezer flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-22 19:33                   ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 1/3] Separate freezer from PM code Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 10:41                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-22 19:39                   ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 2/3] freezer: Introduce freezer_flags Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-22 21:14                     ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-22 22:14                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-22 22:31                         ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-23  3:18                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-04-23  4:09                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-04-23 14:19                       ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2007-04-23 18:49                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 19:06                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 10:50                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-23 13:17                     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-23 19:57                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 22:23                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 22:40                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 22:41                         ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-23 22:55                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 22:55                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 23:10                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 23:19                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-24 11:32                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-22 19:40                   ` [RFC][PATCH -mm 3/3] freezer: Fix problem with kthread_stop Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 10:40                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-23 19:50                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 12:35                     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-23 19:03                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 20:05                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 19:55                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-23 20:46                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 21:16                           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-23 21:30                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 21:20         ` [RFC PATCH(experimental) 2/2] Fix freezer-kthread_stop race Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-20 21:45           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-04-20 10:46     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-21  9:37       ` Pavel Machek
2007-04-20 21:12   ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 10:38     ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-04-23 18:39       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-23 20:34         ` Gautham R Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070423141908.GA6842@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox