Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5

Ingo Molnar
2007-04-23T07:36:47Z

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:

> > do need reinforcement and test results on the basic part: _can_ this
> > design be interactive enough on the desktop? So far the feedback has
> > been affirmative, but more testing is needed.
>
> It seems to be fairly easy to make a scheduler interactive if the
> timeslice is as low as that (not that I've released one for wider
> testing, but just by my own observations). [...]

ok, i'll bite: please release such a scheduler that does that with
5-8-10msec range timeslices :-)

Ingo