From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: Pagecache: find_or_create_page does not call a proper page allocator function
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:10:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070424131042.38c8cbff.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704241256470.12907@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:59:17 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > No, think of the following scenario:
> >
> > - file I/O causes a read of an ext2 file's bitmap. The bitmap is
> > brought into /dev/hda1's pagecache using !__GFP_HIGHMEM
> >
> > - references are released against that page and it's now just clean
> > reclaimable pagecache
> >
> > - someone (say, an online filesystem checker or something) mmaps
> > /dev/hda1 and reads that page.
> >
> > - migration comes alnog and migrates that page into highmem
> >
> > - file I/O causes a read of that bitmap again. We find it in
> > /dev/hda's pagecache.
>
> Read of the bitmap? How would that work? Page cache lookup right?
yup.
sb_bread
->__bread
->__getblk
->__find_get_block
->__find_get_block_slow
->find_get_page
> > Here's set_bh_page().
>
> A highmem page can have buffers???
yep. Take a 4k page which is stored in four discontiguous 1k disk blocks. The
data at page_buffers(page) is the sole way in which we track which parts of
the page belong to which blocks of the disk.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 21:11 Pagecache: find_or_create_page does not call a proper page allocator function Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 21:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 13:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 17:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 19:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 20:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 21:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 17:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 17:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 18:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 19:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:10 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-24 20:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070424131042.38c8cbff.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox