From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com
Subject: Re: Pagecache: find_or_create_page does not call a proper page allocator function
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:53:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070424135348.4e69ac23.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704241344100.13005@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > I would say that the filesystem is broke if it has such expectations
> > > regardless of page migration.
> >
> > Others disagree ;)
> >
> > The filesystem has *told* the core kernel what its allocation constraints
> > are by setting up mapping_gfp_mask(). If the core kernel stops honouring
> > that request then it is core kernel which is broken.
>
> Then I think we should disable page migration for allocations that do not
> allow access to the policy zone. That would fix it.
Can't we use mapping_gfp_mask() when allocating the destination page?
It would be better to do so, really. Who knows, mapping_gfp_mask() might
be extented in the future to say "I want GFP_NOIO" or something. Or a
filesystem might specify GFP_KERNEL for regular pagecache pages or
whatever.
Generally, the interface is "address_space tells core kernel how to
allocate its pages", and to be nice we should honour that in all places
where we allocate a page for an address_space.
If we'd had any brains we would have implemented this function as an
address_space_operations callback, but we don't so we didn't.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 21:11 Pagecache: find_or_create_page does not call a proper page allocator function Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 21:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-23 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 13:09 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 17:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 19:06 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 19:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 20:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:53 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-24 20:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 21:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:38 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 17:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 17:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 17:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 18:53 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-24 19:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 19:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-24 20:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-24 20:20 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070424135348.4e69ac23.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox