From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync()
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:50:34 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070424215034.GA5985@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
del_timer_sync() buys nothing for cancel_delayed_work(), but it is less
efficient since it locks the timer unconditionally, and may wait for the
completion of the delayed_work_timer_fn().
cancel_delayed_work() == 0 means:
before this patch:
work->func may still be running or queued
after this patch:
work->func may still be running or queued, or
delayed_work_timer_fn->__queue_work() in progress.
The latter doesn't differ from the caller's POV,
delayed_work_timer_fn() is called with _PENDING
bit set.
cancel_delayed_work() == 1 with this patch adds a new possibility:
delayed_work->work was cancelled, but delayed_work_timer_fn
is still running (this is only possible for the re-arming
works on single-threaded workqueue).
In this case the timer was re-started by work->func(), nobody
else can do this. This in turn means that delayed_work_timer_fn
has already passed __queue_work() (and wont't touch delayed_work)
because nobody else can queue delayed_work->work.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
--- OLD/include/linux/workqueue.h~2_CDW 2007-04-05 12:20:35.000000000 +0400
+++ OLD/include/linux/workqueue.h 2007-04-25 01:48:24.000000000 +0400
@@ -152,14 +152,15 @@ extern void cancel_work_sync(struct work
/*
* Kill off a pending schedule_delayed_work(). Note that the work callback
- * function may still be running on return from cancel_delayed_work(). Run
- * flush_workqueue() or cancel_work_sync() to wait on it.
+ * function may still be running on return from cancel_delayed_work(), unless
+ * it returns 1 and the work doesn't re-arm itself. Run flush_workqueue() or
+ * cancel_work_sync() to wait on it.
*/
static inline int cancel_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *work)
{
int ret;
- ret = del_timer_sync(&work->timer);
+ ret = del_timer(&work->timer);
if (ret)
work_clear_pending(&work->work);
return ret;
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-24 21:50 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-04-25 10:04 ` [PATCH] cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync() David Howells
2007-04-25 13:02 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-25 12:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-26 14:29 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-26 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-27 6:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-27 7:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070424215034.GA5985@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox