From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jesper.juhl@gmail.com
Subject: 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:16:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704251116.57737.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
For your information :
Once in a while I see the message below after I've just created a new XFS filesystem, mount it and then start copying data to it.
It doesn't happen every time - if I should try to make a guess at the frequency I'd say about 1 in 30.
What I do is this.
1. boot the server (an IBM x336) via the network
2. log in via ssh
3. load scsi modules
4. create raid1 of two disks
5. fdisk /dev/sda and create partitions
6. mkfs.xfs /dev/sda<some_partition>
7. mount -t xfs /dev/sda<some_partition> /mnt/mountpoint
8. ssh -x root@otherserver.mydomain.tld "tar --create --gzip --one-file-system --file - / 2>/dev/null" | tar --extract --gzip --preserve-permissions --numeric-owner --directory /mnt/mountpoint --file -
since I do the above via a remote ssh session to the net-booted server, I don't usually notice
kernel output to the console. But recently I've started looking via dmesg in a second ssh session and
I can say for sure that most of the time there's no problem, but when there is, it is the same
"recursive locking" dump I get.
If more info is needed, just let me know.
...
Ending clean XFS mount for filesystem: sda4
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.20.3generic #1
---------------------------------------------
xfs_fsr/6117 is trying to acquire lock:
(&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<f929422d>] xfs_ilock+0x7d/0xa0 [xfs]
but task is already holding lock:
(&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<f929422d>] xfs_ilock+0x7d/0xa0 [xfs]
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by xfs_fsr/6117:
#0: (&inode->i_mutex/1){--..}, at: [<c016d8b5>] lookup_create+0x25/0x90
#1: (&(&ip->i_lock)->mr_lock){----}, at: [<f929422d>] xfs_ilock+0x7d/0xa0 [xfs]
stack backtrace:
[<c010404a>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
[<c0104732>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
[<c01047e6>] dump_stack+0x16/0x20
[<c0139311>] __lock_acquire+0xb01/0xdf0
[<c0139670>] lock_acquire+0x70/0x90
[<c0133f8b>] down_write+0x3b/0x60
[<f929422d>] xfs_ilock+0x7d/0xa0 [xfs]
[<f9294e17>] xfs_iget+0x467/0x7b0 [xfs]
[<f92aeeb8>] xfs_trans_iget+0x108/0x180 [xfs]
[<f92997db>] xfs_ialloc+0xab/0x520 [xfs]
[<f92afadc>] xfs_dir_ialloc+0x6c/0x2b0 [xfs]
[<f92b82b9>] xfs_mkdir+0x399/0x650 [xfs]
[<f92c0d99>] xfs_vn_mknod+0x119/0x2d0 [xfs]
[<f92c0f68>] xfs_vn_mkdir+0x18/0x20 [xfs]
[<c016ceb8>] vfs_mkdir+0x98/0xe0
[<c016f57e>] sys_mkdirat+0x8e/0xd0
[<c016f5e0>] sys_mkdir+0x20/0x30
[<c0102f7e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99
=======================
...
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
next reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 9:16 Jesper Juhl [this message]
2007-04-25 23:33 ` 2.6.20.3 - possible recursive locking detected - in XFS David Chinner
2007-04-26 10:17 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-04-26 17:13 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-04-27 7:06 ` Klaus Strebel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704251116.57737.jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--to=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox