From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992639AbXDYK6l (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:58:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161875AbXDYK6k (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:58:40 -0400 Received: from lugor.de ([212.112.242.222]:58967 "EHLO solar.vpn.lugor.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161865AbXDYK6i (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:58:38 -0400 From: Christian Hesse To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:51:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Con Kolivas , Nick Piggin , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Williams , Thomas Gleixner , caglar@pardus.org.tr, Willy Tarreau , Gene Heskett , Mark Lord , Ulrich Drepper References: <20070420140457.GA14017@elte.hu> <200704241854.47269.mail@earthworm.de> <20070425092544.GA498@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070425092544.GA498@elte.hu> X-Face: 1\p'dhO'VZk,x0lx6U}!Y*9UjU4n2@4c<"a*K%3Eiu'VwM|-OYs;S-PH>4EdJMfGyycC)=?utf-8?q?k=0A=09=3Anv*xqk4C?=@1b8tdr||mALWpN[2|~h#Iv;)M"O$$#P9Kg+S8+O#%EJx0TBH7b&Q+kRh4`C3[KN`-1uT-TD_m MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2757491.DN77DcP9B4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704251251.49298.mail@earthworm.de> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (solar.vpn.lugor.de [10.5.1.1]); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:51:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Flag: NO Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart2757491.DN77DcP9B4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 25 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Christian Hesse wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i'm pleased to announce release -v5 of the CFS scheduler patchset. > > > > Hi Ingo, > > > > I just noticed that with cfs all processes (except some kernel > > threads) run on cpu 0. I don't think this is expected cpu affinity for > > an smp system? I remember about half of the processes running on each > > core with mainline. > > i've got several SMP systems with CFS and all distribute the load > properly to all CPUs, so it would be nice if you could tell me more > about how the problem manifests itself on your system. > > for example, if you start two infinite loops: > > for (( N=3D0; N < 2; N++ )); do ( while :; do :; done ) & done > > do they end up on the same CPU? > > Or do you mean that the default placement of single tasks starts at > CPU#0, while with mainline they were alternating? That was not your fault. I updated suspend2 to 2.2.9.13 and everything work= s=20 as expected again. Sorry for the noise. =2D-=20 Regards, Chris --nextPart2757491.DN77DcP9B4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGLzLFlZfG2c8gdSURAksOAJ9tJgFTmY3IAAHnob6tfHCfo+IO8ACgrxi9 NnwmJ3t2MHjQLtr9eqAd6BA= =C++a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2757491.DN77DcP9B4--