public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>, Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Nonfunctional ethernet (was Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm1 + sysfs-oops-workaround.patch -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:13:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070425181302.ebae7481.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1177549323.4685.3.camel@daplas>

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:02:02 +0800 "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@gmail.com> wrote:

> I can bring up the network manually using ifconfig.  It's opensuse's
> rcnetwork script that fails to bring the network up. Entries
> in /sys/class/net are still bogus.
> 
> This kernel is now usable to me, I'll start bisection later today if
> nobody has an answer.

rc7-mm1 is hardly worth bothering with.  Quite a few really bad ones have
now been fixed and I'll try to get rc7-mm2 out within the next 12 hours (I
assume a 76-hour debug session won't be needed this time).

But I don't think the sysfs changes in Greg's tree have been updated, so
things will probably still fail in that area.  A suitable bisection
starting pair would be around gregkh-driver-*



  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-26  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-25  5:15 2.6.21-rc7-mm1 + sysfs-oops-workaround.patch -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected Miles Lane
2007-04-25  5:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-25 14:48   ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-25 23:45     ` Nonfunctional ethernet (was Re: 2.6.21-rc7-mm1 + sysfs-oops-workaround.patch -- INFO: possible recursive locking detected) Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-26  1:02       ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-04-26  1:13         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-04-26  2:26           ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-26  2:53             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-26 14:50   ` [PATCH] sysfs: use different lockdep subclass for s_active deactivation Tejun Heo
2007-04-26 15:22     ` Greg KH
2007-04-26 17:21     ` Miles Lane
2007-04-26 17:33       ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-26 18:51         ` Miles Lane

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070425181302.ebae7481.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox