From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423460AbXDZAdl (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:33:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423454AbXDZAdl (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:33:41 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:55875 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423456AbXDZAdk convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:33:40 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2. Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:32:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Randy Dunlap , Martin Schwidefsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mb@bu3sch.de, linville@tuxdriver.com, maxextreme@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de References: <20070423141123.GA21174@skybase> <20070425143011.57247c1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070425172447.1576c399.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070425172447.1576c399.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Face: >j"dOR3XO=^3iw?0`(E1wZ/&le9!.ok[JrI=S~VlsF~}"P\+jx.GT@=?utf-8?q?=0A=09-oaEG?=,9Ba>v;3>:kcw#yO5?B:l{(Ln.2)=?utf-8?q?=27=7Dfw07+4-=26=5E=7CScOpE=3F=5D=5EXdv=5B/zWkA7=60=25M!DxZ=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?8MJ=2EU5?="hi+2yT(k`PF~Zt;tfT,i,JXf=x@eLP{7B:"GyA\=UnN) =?utf-8?q?=26=26qdaA=3A=7D-Y*=7D=3A3YvzV9=0A=09=7E=273a=7E7I=7CWQ=5D?=<50*%U-6Ewmxfzdn/CK_E/ouMU(r?FAQG/ev^JyuX.%(By`" =?utf-8?q?L=5F=0A=09H=3Dbj?=)"y7*XOqz|SS"mrZ$`Q_syCd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704260232.06909.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/bBPzGLdLF59qaGuxhvcqUBQzBWNyPPlr0wXF umNH2rSwlF5rWd8ZiMzxZChMF16zonWa2DEWNsYQkhf6xJs9vZ lKrYmHNMUbKYUcYd4QmQw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 26 April 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > It would be neat if someone could create and maintain a new > scripts/spot-common-mistakes.  Feed it a unified diff and it would complain > about newly-added code (and only newly-added code) which has busted > whitespace, adds new semaphores, adds new kernel_thread calls, etc, etc. http://patchstylecheck.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/patchstylecheckemail.pl Might serve as a starting point for this. It doesn't have any semantic checks right now, but I guess they can be added. Arnd <><