From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754382AbXDZElf (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:41:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754695AbXDZElZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:41:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:42396 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754382AbXDZElY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:41:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 00:38:48 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Message-ID: <20070426043848.GD11278@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 06:08:06AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > What I will NOT do: > Waste my time with tracking 2.6.22-rc regressions. I seriously hope you'll reconsider. If you hadn't have done this, things would have been a *lot* worse imo. But either way, thanks for doing what remains a really grotty job that may not get you as many kernel groupies as rewriting the process scheduler, but is equally as (if not moreso) important. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk