From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933460AbXDZIZZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:25:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933604AbXDZIZY (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:25:24 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:44479 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933605AbXDZIZW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 04:25:22 -0400 From: Oliver Neukum Organization: Novell To: Daniel Barkalow Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:03:59 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704261004.00220.oneukum@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Donnerstag, 26. April 2007 08:46 schrieb Daniel Barkalow: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Number of different known regressions compared to 2.6.20 at the time > > of the 2.6.21 release: > > 14 > > I count 13. (v2) had 15 items, of which 2 were subsequently fixed or found > to be inapplicable. > > > Number of different known regressions compared to 2.6.20 at the time > > of the 2.6.21 release with patches available at the time of the 2.6.21 > > release [1]: > > 3 > > The -stable team can presumably take care of these in 2.6.21.1, right? > That leaves 10 that need developer attention. > >  John Stultz seems to be taking care of 3 of them. > >  Oliver Neukum has 1. Which I haven't succeeded in reproducing and gotten no further info on. Regards Oliver