From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031378AbXDZRsj (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031380AbXDZRsj (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:39 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:35486 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031378AbXDZRsh (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:48:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:48:48 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Message-ID: <20070426174848.GQ3468@stusta.de> References: <20070426040806.GJ3468@stusta.de> <20070426125802.GL3468@stusta.de> <20070426165950.GO3468@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:20:46AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > > But I am not happy with the current state of released kernels. > > So you're going to help exactly how? By stopping to help? Or kvetching > about developers that can't figure out why something regressed. > > Sure, that makes tons of sense sense, Adrian. > > NOT. It is my time, and it's therefore my decision what I consider to make sense spending it for. Instead of continuing our discussion it makes more sense that we simply accept that we disagree regarding when a kernel is ready for being released instead of repeating the same arguments in a lengthy discussion. > Linus cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed