Re: Linux 2.6.21

Tomasz Chmielewski
2007-04-28T21:03:55Z

Adrian Bunk wrote:

> I do hereby promise you to manually ask the submitters of all 1600 open
> bugs in the kernel Bugzilla within one month whether their problem is
> still present with 2.6.21 and forwarding all bugs if the answer was
> "yes" to whoever is the right recipient if you promise me that all bugs
> where the submitter said "yes" will be debugged by a kernel developer
> who knows the corresponding subsystem. [4]

Hmm.
I reported a bug on 2006-08-07 ("ISDN/hisax doesn't work on ARM
architecture"):

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6970

There was not much activity there... and the bug is still opened in
kernel's bugzilla.

However, I received two emails from Andrew Morton on 02.10.2006 - one
with a patch, and the second (automated?) which said:

The patch titled

isdn: work around excessive udelay()

has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename is

isdn-work-around-excessive-udelay.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a
subsystem tree

I'm very happy that the bug was fixed, but why wasn't it automatically
closed in bugzilla (I closed it only today as I looked up into bugzilla)?

Do we have some wrong communication here? How many bugs are there that
are falsely opened, when in reality they were resolved long ago?

--
Tomasz Chmielewski