From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755560AbXD0Ke4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:34:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755571AbXD0Ke4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:34:56 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54984 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755560AbXD0Kez (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:34:55 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file out of date? Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:34:32 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Michael McConnell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4631255F.9010902@eridani.co.uk> <4631873B.1000107@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4631873B.1000107@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704271234.32679.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > A lot of that code (although, of course, not all) could be written in C, > though. I'm thinking of taking a stab at rewriting it that way. That would require a new compiler, right? I don't think that would make users very happy. Besides the code is not exactly that maintenance intensive and only changes rarely so I don't need a pressing need to rewrite it -Andi