Re: Back to the future.

Nigel Cunningham
2007-04-26T09:33:15Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 791 bytes --]

Hi.

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:38 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Apr 26 2007 16:04, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >
> >Hi again.
> >
> >So - trying to get back to the original discussion - what (if anything)
> >do you see as the way ahead?
> >
> >The options I can think of are (starting with things I can do):
> >
> >1) [...]
> >2) [...]
> >3) [...]
> >4) [...]
> >5) [...]
> >6) [...]
> >7) [...]
>
> Perhaps do it the EVMS way? Do as much in userspace as possible, and
> trying having a simple kernel API at the same time.
> Perhaps (3) would be it, but ask Redhat _first_ before quitting anything :)

:) Well, the EVMS way is swsusp. Personally, I agree with Linus that
think putting suspend to disk code in userspace is just a broken idea.

Regards,

Nigel

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]