Re: "REPORT: sd-0.46 vs cfs-v6 vs mainline 2.6.21-rc7 Beryl + Video + Audio"

Kasper Sandberg
2007-04-27T08:43:13Z

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:01 -0700, hechacker1 wrote:
<snip>
> Overall:
> SD-0.46 is my new choice for scheduler. When not under load everything
> run's better or similarly to cfs or mainline. Under load however it
> shows the most responsiveness.
>
> Occasionally I had complete mouse freezes with cfs when the system was
> busy. But rarely.
>
> Under SD i haven't seen anything get starved.
>
> mainline surprisingly works better than i expected, but beryl suffers
> and responsiveness suffers under load.

Your findings seems somewhat similar to mine, what i have observed is
that SD is much more smooth, with vanilla/cfs, under just abit load
opengl stuff will stutter, whereas with sd it will simply get
slightly(or more, depending on the load) lower fps.

>
> --hechacker1
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>