From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755997AbXD0P1l@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755997AbXD0P1l (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:27:41 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755995AbXD0P1l
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:27:41 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48472 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755997AbXD0P1j (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:27:39 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:13:14 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@analog.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
       Justin Forbes <jmforbes@linuxtx.org>,
       Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
       "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
       Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Chuck Wolber <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>,
       Chris Wedgwood <reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org>,
       Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
       torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
       alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 00/33] 2.6.20-stable review
Message-ID: <20070427151314.GA10281@suse.de>
References: <20070426165445.GA1898@kroah.com> <1177668954.5969.18.camel@roc-desktop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1177668954.5969.18.camel@roc-desktop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM +0800, Wu, Bryan wrote:
> 
> You know for some customer's product, they want to use the stable and
> long term support kernel instead to use the latest one. 

Then they should get that support from a vendor, not from the kernel.org
releases :)

thanks,

greg k-h