From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756092AbXD0Riz (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:38:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756096AbXD0Riz (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:38:55 -0400 Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:53591 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756092AbXD0Riy (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:38:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:35:11 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [patch] uml: fix cmpxchg warnings in -mm Message-ID: <20070427173511.GA9373@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20070427172748.GC1046@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070427172748.GC1046@uranus.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:27:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Then atomic.h should include system.h and not rely on someone else doing it. > Yes - then system.h may be included twice but that's ok. I tried that - Andi didn't like it. My current thinking is to pull the cmpxchg stuff out of system.h into its own header since I don't see any existing natural place to put it. Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com