The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <maxextreme@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	oliver pinter <oliver.pntr@gmail.com>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG? -rc7] SMP: Just one CPU activated: P4 3GHz HT
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:02:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070427200247.GA7270@dreamland.darkstar.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <653402b90704230111p50b72586te73c1288f12a0079@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF8, Size: 2490 bytes --]

Il Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:11:52AM +0200, Miguel Ojeda ha scritto: 
> On 4/22/07, Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Probably the two siblings are enumerated only in ACPI tables. If you
> >disable ACPI the kernel won't be aware of the second "core".
> >
> >Luca
> >--
> >"Su cio` di cui non si puo` parlare e` bene tacere".
> > Ludwig Wittgenstein
> >
> 
> On 4/23/07, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >
> >You didn't enable ACPI, it's needed for almost all systems to detect HT
> >and also for many systems to detect multi-cores as well.
> >
> >Aside from that, in general I would say that on any modern x86 system
> >ACPI should always be enabled. In many cases it seems the BIOS code is
> >not tested much without ACPI anymore, so going without ACPI can be
> >problematic.
> >
> >--
> >Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
> >To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
> >Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
> >
> >
> 
> Thanks all of you. It seems the problem is ACPI, however, should not
> it be noted in some way? Maybe at Documentation/smp.txt, maybe at the
> help section at CONFIG_SMP, maybe a "depends on ..."
>
> Or maybe CONFIG_SMP should enable some bits of the ACPI code needed to
> detect such additional cores.

"depends on" is too strong. There exists architecture without ACPI but
with SMP support; even in the x86 world a number of systems still
support both MPS and ACPI.

Mentioning it in the help text should be enough. Roman, are you in
charge for the KConfig files?

---
SMP support in modern systems often relies on ACPI being active; add a
couple of lines in the help text for CONFIG_SMP

Signed-Off-By: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
---

 arch/i386/Kconfig |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/i386/Kconfig b/arch/i386/Kconfig
index 53d6237..48ef899 100644
--- a/arch/i386/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ config SMP
 	  Y to "Enhanced Real Time Clock Support", below. The "Advanced Power
 	  Management" code will be disabled if you say Y here.
 
+	  Note that ACPI is often required to support newer multi-core CPUs
+	  and HT on Intel P4 processors.
+
 	  See also the <file:Documentation/smp.txt>,
 	  <file:Documentation/i386/IO-APIC.txt>,
 	  <file:Documentation/nmi_watchdog.txt> and the SMP-HOWTO available at




Luca
-- 
"Vorrei morire ucciso dagli agi. Vorrei che di me si dicesse: ``Com'è
morto?'' ``Gli è scoppiato il portafogli''" -- Marcello Marchesi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-27 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <fa.2kDN6AWFnkWM37pP5//wKJmbvRQ@ifi.uio.no>
2007-04-22 23:50 ` [BUG? -rc7] SMP: Just one CPU activated: P4 3GHz HT Robert Hancock
2007-04-23  8:11   ` Miguel Ojeda
2007-04-27 20:02     ` Luca Tettamanti [this message]
2007-04-22  8:57 Miguel Ojeda
     [not found] ` <6101e8c40704220300n4cfef0f1l652b303f5bab8d1b@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-22 10:12   ` Miguel Ojeda
     [not found]     ` <6101e8c40704220453v544dce39j9e348939b3cb1f2e@mail.gmail.com>
2007-04-22 12:38       ` Miguel Ojeda
2007-04-22 16:11         ` Luca Tettamanti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070427200247.GA7270@dreamland.darkstar.lan \
    --to=kronos.it@gmail.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxextreme@gmail.com \
    --cc=oliver.pntr@gmail.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox