From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751076AbXD1Nz0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:55:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751878AbXD1Nz0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:55:26 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:59461 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076AbXD1Nyo (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:54:44 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:53:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Con Kolivas , Nick Piggin , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Williams , Thomas Gleixner , caglar@pardus.org.tr, Willy Tarreau , Gene Heskett , Mark Lord , Zach Carter , buddabrod Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v6 Message-ID: <20070428135338.GA8207@elte.hu> References: <20070425214704.GA32572@elte.hu> <20070428124516.GA27292@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070428124516.GA27292@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:47:04PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > The CFS patch against v2.6.21-rc7 or against v2.6.20.7 can be downloaded > > from the usual place: > > > > http://redhat.com/~mingo/cfs-scheduler/ > > +static inline struct rb_node * first_fair(struct rq *rq) > +{ > + if (rq->rb_leftmost) > + return rq->rb_leftmost; > + return rb_first(&rq->tasks_timeline); > +} > > Won't it help if you update rq->rb_leftmost above from the value > returned by rb_first(), so that subsequent calls to first_fair will be > sped up? yeah, indeed. Would you like to do a patch for that? Ingo