From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1163383AbXD1SD6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:03:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1163354AbXD1SD6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:03:58 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39181 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1163383AbXD1SDf (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:03:35 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Organization: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix PSE pagetable construction Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:03:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton References: <4632AE54.7030200@goop.org> <200704281229.48597.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704282003.30118.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 28 April 2007 19:23:55 Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Andi Kleen writes: > > >> My preference would be for whoever had: > >> paravirt_ops-hooks-to-set-up-initial-pagetable.patch > > > > That would be very messy because there are many followup dependencies. > > > > But once we have a good fix aggreed by everybody I can merge it into the > > initial patch then. > > I don't see Xen patches merged yet in your tree yet. Hmm, I thought you were talking about paravirt-initial-pagetable ? That one is in my tree already. The Xen patches that are still outstanding iirc are all addons patches, as they don't impact existing code paths anymore. -Andi