From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752354AbXD1Un6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:43:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754680AbXD1Un6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:43:58 -0400 Received: from mail1.vetienne.net ([87.98.219.23]:4976 "EHLO mail1.vetienne.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752354AbXD1Un5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:43:57 -0400 From: Vincent ETIENNE To: Alan Stern Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB HID bug (was [PROBLEM] Bonding driver in linux-2.6.21-rc6-mm1) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:43:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Jiri Kosina , Greg KH , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Paul Walmsley References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704282243.54950.ve@vetienne.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le Saturday 28 April 2007 21:50:30 Alan Stern, vous avez écrit : > No, it isn't a problem in the USB core. The device itself is messed up; > it really does report idVendor and idProduct both equal to 0. > > Jiri, don't worry about all those other devices in the listing that also > have idVendor and idProduct set to 0. They aren't real devices at all; > they are virtual root hubs. You'll see what I mean if you look at their > iManufacturer, iProduct, and iSerial strings. > > Alan Stern So is it just a scary trace but without consequence that i could ignored ? May i ask you what is the device which is messed up ? ( Maybe should i change it ? )